Ok, I’m going to go a little political on your asses on this post. I never do this, but now I’m getting frustrated. So trigger warning. If you don’t want to mix politics with your BDSM, stop reading, and if you think all sexual assault is created equal and #ibelieveher is right on, and get too angry about it even to discuss it, then please stop reading now!
 
So, Matt Damon said we are living in a “culture of outrage“. He went on to say “there’s a difference between patting someone on the butt and rape or child molestation. Both of those behaviors need to be confronted and eradicated without question, but they shouldn’t be conflated.”

I don’t know anything about this guy, other than I’ve seen him in some movies, but that quote makes sense to me. And yet he’s getting lambasted for saying it!

The proper response to getting any part of you inappropriately touched is to slap the guy in his face. Either that or have a nearby gentleman punch him in the face. That’s adequate punishment. It should be written into the law (I am assuming it is not) as being ok to respond that way. And I think safe enough for me to support #ibelieveher in such cases.

If a man actually rapes a woman then for sure that’s a serious felony and should be treated as such in the courts of law. And in such cases I am absolutely not a proponent of #ibelieveher. These are serious charges with life changing outcomes, and the accused need the ability to confront their accusers in a court of law. I know it’s tough on the girl, and some will not report as a result. But there have been so many cases of false accusations that you cannot “just believe” women, any more than you can “just believe” men.

All the Hollywood scandals are like, really? Those women knew what they were signing up for. They were trading sex for work, or putting up with bad behaviour for work. Just don’t do that if you don’t want to. Find another line of work. I don’t much care about an actress who sleeps her way to the top. I think the guys involved could likely do better at their jobs by not confusing willingness to go to bed with potential box office success, but whatever.

I also don’t get the faux outrage over stories of female teachers sleeping with their teenaged charges. Here’s a 25-year-old art teacher arrested for having sex with four high-school aged boys in her art class.

Ok, not the smartest move, but good grief, is there a victim here? I think for there to be a crime there needs to be a victim. If a boy was victimized, damaged in some way, then fine, consider that. The real victims are the other 20 boys in the class who didn’t get to sleep with her. I think the appropriate “punishment” is to let those other randy youngsters have at her also.

I think there really is a difference here if you reverse the sexes. But it’s like 99 times out of 100 there is harm in one case, and in 1 out of 100 there is harm the other way. Fine, treat them the same, but ask if there is an actual victim involved.

Then there’s this idiotic idea that a woman can dress how she wants, act how she wants, drink as much as she wants, go anywhere she wants, with anybody she wants (e.g., dress provocatively, flirt outrageously, drink heavily, go alone to a guys’ room, make out with him, and then say “no”). Yes, the guy should stop. But does the woman have none of the blame here? Really? NONE?

To me, that’s a lesser offense then some guy in a ski mask breaking into your home and violently raping you against your will. Can’t we agree on that? Guess not.

Tell me what you guys think. Am I right on, or out to lunch? No need to be politically correct here. All comments welcomed.
Source: Strict Julie Spanks

Sexual Assault?
#femdomhypnosis